City makes another payment to cover Bluffwalk

City makes another payment to cover Bluffwalk

File photo

This year, the city set aside nearly $326,000 in Community Development Block Grant money to make the August payment and the $71,000 interest-only payment due in February.

» 22 Comments | Post a Comment

The developers of Lynchburg’s Bluffwalk Center could not come up with the cash for this summer’s payment on a federal loan, leaving the city to cover a $250,000 installment for the second time in two years.

The payment, due today, is tied to a $3.2 million federal loan. City Council guaranteed the loan from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development in 2002, meaning the city has to make payments when the developers cannot.

The city sent in a payment of $254,686 on July 23 to ensure the funds would clear by the Aug. 1 deadline, said City Manager Kimball Payne.

Hal Craddock, Bluffwalk’s lead developer, said this week that the project will reimburse, with interest, the more than $500,000 the city has spent backing the loan. He predicted that the developers would not need city funds to make any more payments. He also said business is picking up at the hotel and conference center, which recently opened its second restaurant and has seen its occupancy rate grow past 70 percent.

Making the business successful “just has taken more time than we thought,” Craddock said.

“We’ll certainly make the February payment, and I believe we’ll be able to make all the rest,” he said.

Payne said the city is working on a document that would formalize the reimbursement intent of both parties — which is that Bluffwalk’s developers will repay the city for covering the loan payments this year and last year, plus interest, he said.

The timeline on the repayment is uncertain. Payne said it is due “when they have the money.”

“There’s no schedule here because I don’t have the ability to demand a schedule,” he said. The loan is subordinated to a loan from Wachovia, meaning the bank gets paid first.

Payne said the document is a “concept piece” not ready for release to the public.

Craddock said he got a copy Wednesday and sent it to the Bluffwalk partnership’s lawyer.

The company made all the payments on the HUD loan for three years without a problem. But its business plan called for the hotel to open in spring 2007 to provide revenue for that summer’s payment.

With the doors still not open last July, the city had to pay the bill.

For the Aug. 1 payment this year, Craddock tried unsuccessfully to convince Wachovia Securities to free up $1 million in historic tax credits. The federal government awarded those tax credits because the project revitalized two historic buildings.Last winter, the investment firm stopped releasing the tax credit money as a protection in case the complex failed and the IRS recalled the credits.

Craddock said his communication has been slow in that effort because with millions of dollars in bad mortgages nationwide, Wachovia has “bigger fish in the frying pan.”

Payne said it’s not even clear whether Wachovia is focusing on the Bluffwalk situation.

Bluffwalk’s inability to make this summer’s payment is “disappointing,” said vice-mayor Bert Dodson. “I thought there would be an opportunity for them to make at least a partial payment, but that did not occur.”

This year, the city set aside nearly $326,000 in Community Development Block Grant money to make the August payment and the $71,000 interest-only payment due in February.

That led to decreased allocations to other organizations, such as the Lynchburg Redevelopment and Housing Authority.

If the Bluffwalk developers make the February payment, the $71,000 could be distributed to other projects, said Mike Gillette, the city councilman who chairs the Community Development Advisory Committee.

He said the redistribution could happen fairly quickly.

Craddock said the city won’t have to make the next payment because of improvements in Bluffwalk’s business.

In June, the center’s second restaurant, the pizzeria and brewpub Waterstone, opened and is doing well. Stephan Parry, managing partner of the restaurant, said the business is “right on target.”

Also in June, the hotel passed 70 percent occupancy, compared to less than 40 percent in December.

Craddock said in previous interviews that the hotel needed about 60 percent occupancy to break even.

He said Wednesday that a full-time room salesperson has been hired, and he expects the hotel to reach 80 percent occupancy by the end of 2008.

City leaders are keeping an eye on the project’s financial success, though some want more information.

“I haven’t seen any financials lately, but I understand that they have cash flow coming in now, and they’re feeling better about how that’s going,” Payne said.

At-large City Councilman Scott Garrett and Ward III councilman Jeff Helgeson have asked for details on Bluffwalk’s plans to repay the city, and on the business’s financial situation.

“I’ve been trying to get a good sense of their financial picture,” Garrett said. “I’ve been asking for it, but I have not seen that level of understanding.”

Craddock said the business should have money for a partial repayment soon, which would be drawn from an investor he said is lined up to buy some of the corporation’s stock. That payment would be turned over to the city, he said.

It would not be a huge amount, he said, but “it’s a good-faith effort to tell the city we want to work on this.”

He would not specify the amount because of other competing creditors that might ask for payment, he said.

Dodson compared the current pain of paying to “buyer’s remorse,” but he still thinks the business will succeed in time.

“It’s going to take at least a couple of years to get on their feet,” he said. “It’s an unfortunate situation, but we have to work through the situation.”

It’s not all bad news at Bluffwalk. It’s new pizza restaurant, Waterstone, is doing brisk business, along with other parts of the center. Business has picked up enough, says the lead developer, that he predicts Bluffwalk will not need any more city money.
CHET WHITE/THE NEWS & ADVANCE

Advertisement

 
View More: lynchburg,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Freedom on August 03, 2008 at 10:33 pm

..BLUFFWALK,,the time has come for us to take you to FEDERAL COURT to resolve this ,,and craddock,,its time for you to talk w/scrooge and us to stop u !!

Flag Comment Posted by Freedom on August 02, 2008 at 12:15 pm

,,so we dont get our money back!!cant we get some kind of an internal investagation,,and how could a business man like the BUG MAN not look out for us i mean why do we put people in office he should be proscuted for VIOLATING PUBLIC TRUST AND ABUSE OF POWER,,where is our new federal proscutors??duuuddd,,just this week BUSH gave away 48 billion of our tax dollars to the world aids program,,and gave CDC 3.75 billion,,this is not our gov..some kinda of NEW WORLD ORDER must have seigezed it,,we have lost control from our own litle town to the W/H..and we have negative -3 trillion dollar hwy fund and some how the w/h says we have only a -500 billion defecit,,as he signs away 48 billion to aids??ITS JUST PLAIN CRIMINAL!!

Flag Comment Posted by lburger on August 02, 2008 at 8:20 am

Think of all the things a half-million dollars could do for the people of Lynchburg! Instead, the city gives it (Does anyone really think Hal Craddock is going to pay it back?) to the heir of a shoe factory who probably has that much money in a shoebox under his bed. The city could have given the money to organizations that help people (don’t just give them the “opportunity” to eat $200 meals for two) or improved our parks or other public facilities, things everyone has access to. Hal Craddock should be ashamed of himself, really, as should the city for putting the dreams of the rich in front of the needs of the citizens.

Flag Comment Posted by bigjimm on August 02, 2008 at 6:30 am

Sorry, but that reasoning just won’t work. The idea is to help the local community with the CDBG funds, not bail out a poorly reasoned and shaky investment for an old Lynchburg family not known for doing great things for the community. The city made a huge mistake by guaranteeing the Section 108 loan back in 2003 without tying it to an agreement with Craddock and his associates to pay the money back. Hal Craddock got his money up front and has stated that his only investment in this undertaking is sweat equity.
It would appear that the main focus of this undertaking was to increase certain property values downtown for certain people. A typical plan in Lynchburg where the main concerned is your name and how much money you have and how long you have had it.
Lynchburg has used the CDBG money to help fund the non-profits and whether that is the best use for it or not, it is a far better use than further enriching Hal Craddock and his associates.

Flag Comment Posted by Freedom on August 02, 2008 at 5:56 am

A VILLAGE;;whats really happening is that people are just tired of gov.rasing taxes and always broke,,especially when we ourselves are broke..people give their gov.an 80% overall dis-aprovial rating,,we dont know if we r getting this money back,,so too is fannie/freedie a private bus..they got a 25 billion to 1.6 trillion bail-out,,while their ceo,s get 29 million sAlary/bonus package,,chrysler got billions,and billons of bail-out money in the regan 80,s year,,did we tax payers get it back..NO,,iacco got his milllions in salary/bonus etc,,then chrysler was sold to the germans at a nice profit,,that profit did it go back to the TAXPAYERS GOV..again NO ,,the ceo,s partied on lear corp jets all over the world in their TOGA,S and the SHAREHOLDER got the rest of the profit,,CHRYSLER ,,paid us the working taxpayers ,,by outsourcing our jobs,,bankrupting our pensions/medical benefits,,and and they all keep commin back to the taxpayers DOOR,,,,RED CROSS,,well the ceo makes a wopping salary of 500,000 $,,its a non-profit orag..so why take our blood out of our veins for free,,get us to work free,,donate money,,ssee this a just a couple of example ,,however ITS THE WAY ALL BUSINESS IS NOW DONE !!we the people ARENT stupid,,but we have lost control of everything,,our gov.runs amok..so a ? for u or anyone,,just what does the ceo of bluffwalk get ,,1.00$$ or a million,,how much of that money is going to the project,,25 cents on the dollar and the other 75 cents to what they call ADMINASTRATION/OVERHEAD COST,,the same w/exon 100,s of billions in profit,,and they get billions from our gov..in tax money for what??and on and on and on,,

Flag Comment Posted by ducky on August 02, 2008 at 5:56 am

Its a lovely thought to believe the money will be re paid, its a lovely thought to believe the Bluffwalk will come to life with in the scope of the 10 yr plan. The monies used by the city to pay the loan were allotted for many non- profits that are now struggling. NOn profits that feed people and help with health care and so forth not luxery rooms with fire places. Its hard for people to conceive the Bluffwalk Center, the renovations to create walkways, little shops and so forth to be a positive when so many empty buildings sit in the downtown area and have sat empty for years. Other developers have built in the downtown area and did it with tax credits; however, they honored the rules and a regulation, the hotel has not. Wachovia will not release the funds due to lack of occupancy it’s a no brainier. Summer is winding down and so will any tourism, which equates to open rooms. In addition the bank, I’m sure, asked for a financial out look of income to the occupancy and that does not equate either. so giving rooms away at 100.00 a week still won’t give them an accurate occupancy rate due to the numbers not adding up. Why would Wachovia release funds, numbers don’t lie. What are property owners to think when the city starts redeveloping the lower basin area and funds run out due to picking the tab for Hal Craddocks debt. Are they to sit and stare at half built sidewalks, walkways and half way done buildings?

Flag Comment Posted by LiberalSherlock on August 02, 2008 at 1:28 am

Say, a friend of mine owns a shop on Main Street. Can he count on a government handout to expand his business? Maybe a few hundred grand to renovate his building? I don’t see why not seeing as how the morons on City Council (except for Helgeson; he actually has common sense)have once again used public dollars to finance a private business. Gee, let’s be fair and give all business owners a little charity. What makes Hal Craddock so special that only he is allowed such privilges?

Flag Comment Posted by avillage on August 01, 2008 at 7:47 pm

The city is not making the payment with “its” money, its making the payment with CDBG money. That’s federal block grant dollars that the city gets per a formula. CDBG dollars have a variety of potential uses, including low income housing provision, businesses in low income areas (that’s the essence, though I’m not quite getting it exact), downtown development, etc. Bluff Walk fits.

One thing everyone is missing is that the city has attracted lots of dollars, both federal and state, to the development of downtown. I’d bet that the amount that has come in far exceeds that which will be made in a payment.

As for “the government has no business in helping private business,“ let me note that most CDBG awards are to private corporations. Yes, most are non-profits and they are private businesses. Should the city make those awards? Aren’t they helping private businesses when they do so?

Let’s say Lynchburg Neighborhood Development Foundation or Meals On Wheels (who probably does not apply for CDBG funds), both of whom have done yeoman’s work for this city, begin to experience financial difficulty for whatever reason. Their services start to dwindle, services that government funded social services won’t pick up. The city decides to award operating funds in the form of CDBG to each to help them continue while they get on their feet? Is that a problem? Government just helped private businesses.

Remember, too, tax credit money is being withheld from Bluffwalk by Wachovia, $1,000,000, money that would make the payments and maybe help weather the storm. Wachovia, itself with major losses, says it won’t release the money because of fear that Bluffwalk will belly up and the govt will recall the tax credits. Chicken or the egg. Wachovia holds money that could help Bluffwalk get on its feet and Wachovia now doesn’t want to take the risk.

Don’t blame the city. Not every idea works and this idea is far from dead. Give it a chance.

Flag Comment Posted by Cleo on August 01, 2008 at 3:39 pm

Hey, I owe some bills. I wonder if the city will pay them for me?
The only people to blame for all of this are the idiots that voted for these people on this council!!!

Flag Comment Posted by jedihunter on August 01, 2008 at 12:32 pm

The City has no business providing payment guarantees!  Certain Council members are too comfortable with local businessmen - there’s too much “wink, wink”, “nudge, nudge” regarding development in this city.  More change on Council is needed.  It’s time some Council members acknowledge they’ve done their civic duty and step aside.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement