UPDATE: Kaine calls on LU to reconsider Democratic club ban
File photo
Gov. Timothy M. Kaine, left, with Liberty University president Jerry Falwell Jr. during a visit to the university in October 2008.
Kaine urges Liberty to reverse Democratic group ban
Updated 4:15 p.m.:
Liberty University president Jerry Falwell Jr. made his first public comments today about the university’s suspension of the campus Democratic party club.
“That club still has the right to exist,“ Falwell said, although it cannot use the university’s name in its activities.
“They still can meet on campus,“ in certain rooms, he said. “There is absolutely no animosity at all toward any of these kids.
“They are good, Christian kids who sit with me at ball games. I just hope they find a pro-life family organization to affiliate with so they can be endorsed by Liberty again.“
More politicians, including Gov. Timothy M. Kaine, have joined gubernatorial candidate Terry McAuliffe in commenting about Liberty University’s revocation of the campus Democratic Party club.
Kaine issued a statement on the letterhead of the Democratic National Committee, of which he is chairman. It said: “I urge the leadership of Liberty University to reverse this attack on the liberty of its students and allow the College Democrats to have the same rights on campus as their counterparts, the College Republicans.“
Creigh Deeds, a candidate for the Democratic nomination for governor, also issued a statement. “Virginia is the home of free speech,“ Deeds said. “Restricting free speech and discouraging students from participating in the political process are not what our colleges and universities should be about. I call on Liberty University to reverse their decision and reinstate the Liberty University Democratic Club.“
Mike Signer, a Democratic candidate for lieutenant governor, said:
“The decision of the Liberty University administration to revoke the recognition of the students’ Democratic organization is deeply troubling. It is even more problematic that the school has decided to continue to recognize the campus Republicans.“
Signer said he has contacted Democratic Club members at Liberty and “Together, we can fight this clear violation of the American tradition of the freedom of speech and political organization.”
Updated 11:50 a.m.:
Democratic gubernatorial candidate Terry McAuliffe held a conference call with reporters this morning.
Liberty University’s Democratic party club president Brian Diaz and the club’s staff adviser, Maria Childress, answered questions from reporters throughout the state during the call.
Many of the questions focused on the issue of censorship, and McAuliffe responded by saying he favors free speech and including more people in the civic process.
Earlier:
Liberty University has revoked its recognition of the campus Democratic Party club, saying “we are unable to lend support to a club whose parent organization stands against the moral principles held by” the university.
“It kind of happened out of nowhere,” said Brian Diaz, president of LU’s student Democratic Party organization, which LU formally recognized in October.
Diaz said he was notified of the school’s decision May 15 in an e-mail from Mark Hine, vice president of student affairs.
According to the e-mail, the club must stop using the university’s name, holding meetings on campus, or advertising events. Violators could incur one or more reprimands under the school’s Liberty Way conduct code, and anyone who accumulates 30 reprimands is subject to expulsion.
Hine said late Thursday that the university could not sanction an official club that supported Democratic candidates.
“We are in no way attempting to stifle free speech.”
Hine said the university had recently completed a policy that would govern clubs and organizations on campus.
“We looked at each club and organization to determine where it stood and unfortunately this one kind of got in the sights of policy, if you will,” he said.
Hine’s e-mail mentioned that he had expressed a concern to Diaz about the national Democratic Party’s platform during a meeting earlier in the semester.
Last fall, Diaz said, Hine had complimented the club for being a faith-based organization working within the Democratic Party.
Jan Dervish, secretary of the club, and Maria Childress, its staff adviser, said they met with Hine after the revocation and asked for a further explanation.
“He said it wasn’t us. It was the national Democratic Party,” which the campus club’s constitution supports, Dervish said. The campus club also opposes abortion and supports the traditional view of marriage, Dervish said.
“His bottom line was, ‘You can’t be a Democrat and be a Christian and be a university representative,’” Childress said.
Hine denied saying that.
Part of Hine’s e-mail said, “The Democratic Party platform is contrary to the mission of Liberty University and to Christian doctrine (supports abortion, federal funding of abortion, advocates repeal of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, promotes the “LGBT” agenda, hate crimes, which include sexual orientation and gender identity, socialism, etc.)” LGBT refers to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people.
Mark Lawrence, chairman of the citywide Lynchburg Democratic Party, called The News & Advance Thursday after he learned about the revocation.
“My issue with this is the statement that the Democratic Party platform is contrary to the mission of Liberty University and to Christian doctrine,” Lawrence said. “They are essentially saying, ‘you cannot be a Christian and a Democrat.’”
Lawrence said he doesn’t personally support every plank in the party’s platform, and many Democrats also have their own differences with the document, which is assembled every four years for the national convention.
Hine’s e-mail said, “The candidates this club supports uphold the platform and implement it. The candidates supported are directly contrary to the mission of Liberty University.”
The goals of the Democratic Party and LU “run in opposite directions,” the e-mail said.
LU has had a College Republicans club for several years.
Claire Ayendi, who was chairman of the Republican club last year and graduated this spring, said she didn’t regard the university’s disbanding of the Democratic group as a political act.
“I think it’s more like a moral issue,” Ayendi said. “Letting a club like that exist goes against what the school is founded on,” she said.
Democratic Party club adviser Childress, an administrative assistant in the university’s honors program, said she sees her role as supporting students, especially their academic status.
“I love and support the university,” said Childress, who earned a bachelor’s degree in elementary education from LU in 2004. “But my support is to the students as well. My number one goal is protecting them,” she said.
Dervish said he asked Hine whether LU would let him work off campus in Democratic Party activities. Dervish said Hine told him and Childress that students’ activities outside the school were not affected by the university’s decision to revoke the club’s recognition.
In a written statement sent to The News & Advance Thursday night, Hine said, “Among other things, Liberty University stands for the sanctity of human life. The loss of human life through abortion is a great tragedy and we cannot remain silent when the political policies or politicians themselves promote the destruction of innocent human life.
“While those who are members of the LU Democratic Club are well intentioned and honorable, the platform and policies of the national Democratic Party and the candidates supported by that party, and thus the student organization itself, are inconsistent with the mission of the University.”
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Tonight Junior made national news again on MSNBC.
Keep up the fine hypocritical work.
Mr. Knipp, you’ve forgotten your boyscout training. Where there is smoke, there is fire. Ask a marketing type. Otherwise, you better start wearing your flame-retardant underwear.
Neuropath, I don’t know that I agree with the conclusion “LU’s tactics are despised by many”... I would say that conclusion certainly applies to a very vocal few, and that number is highly amplified by the verbosity, passion, and repetition for which those few are known.
neuropath - “I personally don’t believe it’s a big deal in the grand scheme of things.“ God’s not on your side.
neuropath - “It’s no secret that liberal politics and ideologies dominate at most universities in the USA.“ There’s a good reason for that.
neuropath - “[LU] pride themselves as being Christian, conservative, and politically incorrect, and they consider themselves to be the fastest growing evangelical Christian university.“ They consider themselves? Do you mean to emphasize not the fact but the primacy? Well, if that’s Liberty’s pride, then Liberty’s in for a fall.
neuropath - “I don’t know why the general public feels so threatened by LU, being that the vast majority of schools are not remotely Christian or conservative.“ You’re flattering yourself to think of LU as Don Quixote. They are not chivalrous. They have done damage. And they are threatening their neighbors.
neuropath - “Most of those people that despise the ideals, values, or tactics of other universities and have beliefs similar to those held by LU most likely appreciate that there is a school out there like LU that they can go to.“ Oh, so LU attendants “despise the ideals, values, or tactics of other universities”? Are you sure your qulaified for this work, neuropath? We still love you neuropath, it’s just your alma mater has a social disease that needs curing.
Thanks neuropath, for recalling “arcade of BS”. Yes, “we certainly have to learn how to weed through it”, but Truth is a process not a thing. The goal is to find truth in everyone and thing. That’s the beauty of being Human.
If Liberty were up front about that, we wouldn’t have a problem.
OK so neuropath isn’t a PR person for LU, but I knew I recognized PR when I saw it.
All one has to do is read the comments in this forum to know LU’s tactics are despised by many. It’s not that I’m underestimating this, and I certainly don’t condone a lot of the tactics they use, it’s that I personally don’t believe it’s a big deal in the grand scheme of things. It’s no secret that liberal politics and ideologies dominate at most universities in the USA. LU is just one school out of many. They pride themselves as being Christian, conservative, and politically incorrect, and they consider themselves to be the fastest growing evangelical Christian university. Obviously, these traits do not make LU a favorite to win any popularity contests. However, there must be a market for this type of school, being that the student body is growing quite rapidly. I don’t know why the general public feels so threatened by LU, being that the vast majority of schools are not remotely Christian or conservative. Most of those people that despise the ideals, values, or tactics of other universities and have beliefs similar to those held by LU most likely appreciate that there is a school out there like LU that they can go to. Obviously, not all students will like or appreciate it, but that’s why we have the freedom to choose what college we attend. LU is pretty up front about what they believe and teach. It is a faith-based school. It shouldn’t be surprising that they have the rules they do, teach the things they do, and have the type of students that they do. And it also shouldn’t surprise anybody that hypocrisy exists. Wherever people are, especially when religious faith is involved, there will be hypocrisy. This is sad but true. However, this doesn’t mean that the Truth isn’t there somewhere. Like you said before, MrCrisp, we should not accept the world as an arcade of BS, but we certainly have to learn how to weed through it.
neuropath - “I don’t agree with LU’s decision, but I don’t believe it’s that big of a deal either.“ Maybe you’re underestimating how despised Liberty’s tactics are?
haha…I’m definitely NOT a PR person for LU. What i posted is an email that I received from LU, and I’m assuming they sent it to all students, alumni, and employees. I am an alumnus, which is why I received the email. Personally, I don’t agree with LU’s decision, but I don’t believe it’s that big of a deal either. I posted the content of this email because it seems as though many people are making assumptions about LU’s position. I thought some of you might like to hear it straight from the horse’s mouth.
neuropath is very obviously a PR person for LU, whether paid or volunteer.
Wasn’t John McCain endorsed by LU Republican Club?
“”“Keyes: What you would say if your daughter was ever in a position where she might need an abortion? You answered [earlier today] that the choice would be up to her and then that you’d have a family conference. That displayed a profound lack of understanding of the basic issue of principle involved in abortion. After all, if your daughter said she was contemplating killing her grandmother for the inheritance, you wouldn’t say, “Let’s have a family conference.” You’d look at her and say “Just Say No,“ because that is morally wrong. It is God’s choice that that child is in the womb. And for us to usurp that choice in contradiction of our declaration of principles is just as wrong.
McCAIN: I am proud of my pro-life record in public life, and I will continue to maintain it. I will not draw my children into this discussion. As a leader of a pro-life party with a pro-life position, I will persuade young Americans [to] understand the importance of the preservation of the rights of the unborn.“”“
Is this really a pro-life candidate? Note; He will persuade, not tell.
LU hyprocrites.
Find us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Advertisement