Liberty University mulled ownership of D-Day Memorial

Liberty University mulled ownership of D-Day Memorial

File photo

Liberty University has considered taking ownership of the financially struggling National D-Day Memorial after being approached by officials from the Bedford landmark.

» 27 Comments | Post a Comment

Related:

D-Day memorial at risk of closing, president says

 

Liberty University has considered taking ownership of the financially struggling National D-Day Memorial after being approached by officials from the Bedford landmark, Chancellor Jerry Falwell Jr. said Wednesday.

“I just don’t see where it fits with our educational mission at this time,” Falwell said.

“But their proposal — we’re willing to look at it, and they could convince us otherwise with some creative thinking.

“It’s such an asset to this whole region and the men that died; they deserve that honor and respect. But so far, there’s no concrete plans for Liberty to become the owner.”

Liberty has been involved with the foundation over the past year in planning a two-day conference that begins today commemorating the 65th anniversary of D-Day.

More than 30 historians, veterans and others are scheduled to speak at the conference, which also is expected to draw in an attendance of at least 100 people. The conference will be held at the LU Law School.

That conference kicks off a larger celebration of D-Day starting Saturday at 11 a.m., at the memorial. The event includes music, a reunion tent for veterans, oral histories, a USO show and hundreds of luminaries lit in honor of those who lost their lives in the D-Day invasion.

All these events come just a week after Memorial Foundation President William McIntosh said that the memorial is in financial trouble and at risk of closure.

It operates on a $2.2 million yearly budget, he said, and brings in about $600,000 a year from ticket sales, gift shop proceeds and tours.

Barry Moore, LU’s vice president for outreach and strategic partnerships, said the college had been in talks with the foundation on and off for about six months.

“We gave it a good look, and thought it through thoroughly,” he said. “But just too much is going on at LU right now to add a new partner or financial relationship.”

When in discussions with local organizations, McIntosh said, most said either that the memorial would not support their educational mission, or that the financial burden would be too great.

One possible solution came Wednesday as Rep. Tom Perriello, D-5th District, introduced a bill in the U.S. House of Representatives to bring the National D-Day Memorial under the National Park Service’s supervision.

“The National D-Day Memorial is a reminder of the bravery and heroism of our American armed forces, and we must not let it fail,” Perriello said in a statement. “The men we lost were local heroes, but the freedom and security bought with their sacrifice is a national treasure. So, too, is our D-Day Memorial.”

U.S. Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., plans to introduce a companion bill in the Senate.

McIntosh said that coming under the leadership of the National Park Service would be a “very desirable scenario” for the memorial.

“I am pleased that it is going to go through both houses of the Congress,” he said, “and I’m hopeful that the events (in commemoration of D-Day) of the next few days, and the attention that veterans and the D-Day memorial will receive will create a kind of excitement that will, perhaps, move the process along a little faster than it otherwise might.”

Advertisement

 
View More: liberty university,bedford,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by bigjimm on June 04, 2009 at 10:27 am

Conservative values? You are confusing conservative values with republican/rightwing politics.
I can see why this happens but American conservative values did not start when Reagan was elected president but that’s when Falwell and his cronies started putting in their values and calling them conservative.

Flag Comment Posted by tcsajs on June 04, 2009 at 9:56 am

Yes it a bad idea.  It does not follow their educational plan or needs. But to say they are against freedom and the american way is ridiculous.  Just because they promote conservative values does not mean they are against freedom and the american way.  If they promoted liberal values then would it be okay. I would imagine you would say yes.

Flag Comment Posted by free2 on June 04, 2009 at 9:11 am

something like a water slide without water
a ski slope without snow
maybe a resort and casino with a tribulation launch pad

Flag Comment Posted by free2 on June 04, 2009 at 9:00 am

some other concrete plan should finally finish off lbc
something as concrete as heritage usa

Flag Comment Posted by lburgnative on June 04, 2009 at 8:31 am

Keep LU out!  Turning it into a federal park would be in the best intrest of the facility.  It is a HORRIBLE thing about the finacial situation the memorial is in but just trying to give it the money saturated LU is just wrong.  They are right when they say it has nothing to do with their education programs and it should stay that way.  Thanks but no thanks.

Flag Comment Posted by Martha on June 04, 2009 at 7:59 am

My mother and father, both WWII veterans, would be not only rolling their eyes but rolling over in their graves.

Flag Comment Posted by bigjimm on June 04, 2009 at 7:05 am

What a desperate travesty that would have been. An institution so opposed to freedom and the American way taking over this monument of supreme sacrifice. It makes one shudder.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.
 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement