LU applies for hydropower exploration at Scott’s Mill Dam
Photo by Jill Nance
Sterling Carden fishes in front of the Scott’s Mill Dam located on River Road in Lynchburg.
Liberty University is one of two entities applying to explore the feasibility of a hydropower facility at Scott’s Mill Dam on the James River.
Located between the John Lynch Bridge in downtown Lynchburg and Daniel’s and Treasure islands, the 15-foot-high Scott’s Mill Dam was built in the 1830s or 1840s, according to The News & Advance archives.
“It may or may not be feasible (to build a hydropower station on the dam),” said Liberty Chancellor Jerry Falwell Jr. “We don’t know that yet. It’s an old dam, and it might have leaks. But we just want to keep our options open because electricity is expensive, and it’s not getting cheaper.”
Liberty, which owns the nearby islands, is competing against North Carolina-based Piedmont Hydropower LLC for a permit to explore the feasibility of using the dam to produce hydropower.
Both have filed applications for preliminary permits with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which handles licensing for hydropower facilities.
If approved, a preliminary permit grants the holder priority to study the feasibility of building a hydropower facility at the site, said Celeste Miller, spokesperson for FERC.
“So someone else can’t come in in those three years and develop the site,” she said, but “a permit does not authorize construction of any kind.”
Before a plant may be built, FERC requires a “much more involved” licensing process, Miller said, which also involves several options for public comment.
Scott’s Mill Hydropower LLC, a subsidiary of Piedmont Hydropower, filed for the permit in October of last year. The company has four preliminary applications for sites in Danville, North Carolina and Florida, said manager Kevin Edwards. It also owns and operates two hydropower projects in North Carolina, he said.
“The James River has a long history of hydropower,” he said, referring to five facilities operating within about a 30-mile stretch upstream of Scott’s Mill.
“This would just take that dam, right now where that energy is being wasted, and make some clean energy with it,” he said.
Liberty followed Edwards’ application with one of its own in February.
Last month, Falwell said the school has been considering options for generating its own electricity since the school’s utility bill increased 40 percent last fall.
“We’re just reserving our rights by filing this application,” he said Tuesday. “The first (power facility) might be biomass; it might be solar; it might be this. It’s just part of our due diligence to see what will work, and what won’t. It’s not a simple process.”
FERC accepted Liberty’s application for review on March 6, Miller said.
That started a 60-day window in which stakeholders and the public may submit comments to FERC, and any other competing applications may be filed, she said.
As of Tuesday, FERC’s Web site showed comments submitted from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality and the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. Both cited concerns of fish passage through a hydropower facility.
The DEQ “generally supports the responsible development of clean renewable energy sources,” the agency states in a submitted letter. “However, Scotts Mill dam would be considered as an ideal candidate for removal if not for the proposed hydropower application.”
Luminaire Technologies, the owner of the dam, also has submitted a letter in support of Liberty’s project.
The letter states that Luminaire has granted Liberty “exclusive rights to access” the site, and has made no such agreement with Scott’s Mill Hydropower.
Miller said all comments will be considered when FERC decides on the applications.
The city of Lynchburg also has filed a motion to intervene in the process, stating that “Lynchburg has a direct and sub-stantial interest in the issues and outcome in this proceeding.”
The dam is partially within the city of Lynchburg, and partially in Amherst County, said Tim Mitchell, city utilities director.
The motion states that, “The proposed project will impact or potentially impacts recreational, historical, cultural and other resources in Lynchburg as well as Lynchburg’s water rights and water supply.”
Mitchell said that the city wants “a seat at the table in discussions about the project to make sure that any concerns we may have would be addressed in the process. Our water rights are tied to that dam, so we certainly want to protect our water rights in the process. We want to make sure that there’s no adverse impacts to the James River.”
The only hydropower facility currently in the city, he said, is upstream from Scott’s Mill at Reusens Dam, operated by Appalachian Power Co.
In the early 80s, Apco studied the feasibility of a hydroelectric plant at Scott’s Mill, but ultimately found that the high cost of building a facility would not offset a relatively small amount of power it would generate, according to The News & Advance archives.
Both Falwell and Edwards said they likely would sell the energy that the site produced, if a plant is built.
Miller said the length of time FERC needs to make a decision depends on the number of comments submitted. However, all four preliminary permits that Piedmont Hydropower currently has were granted within six to ten months of filing the application, according to the company’s Web site.
Reader Reactions
jsm, lu is not just another business in Lynchburg. It is a gay bashing, right wing, anti feminist establishment that pays its help under scale and seems to gain great pleasure by lording itself over the city and its inhabitants.
Hence the tramp stamp that used to be scenery.
With that handiwork in mind, some are worried about aesthetics, but….
All of us who reside in Lynchburg, with some intelligence, can sense the impending doom of such a place having control over our water.
Why don’t you take your tired “if you don’t like it, move” mantra and file it. Its clear that “we” didn’t get taught manners on the hill. I’m sure you can’t dance either, pity!
Lynchburg was here before lu and it will be here after.
Until then we will tolerate you, maybe.
It makes a lot of sense that there are a huge number of people that are so anti-Liberty. Chances are everywhere in Lynchburg you will come in contact with a Liberty student or Liberty grad on a daily basis. We are people just like everyone else. Some you can get a long with some you don’t. I think it is interesting that some are being negative about Liberty applying for the hydropower exploration permit, considering that another company applied for the permit before Liberty did. Anyways, if it wasn’t for the big employers like Liberty, Areva, and bwxt in the Central Virginia area then Lynchburg wouldnt really be anything. The amount of money that Liberty generates for the local economy is unreal. People really need to stop and think about what they are criticizing and if you dont like it move to another town. Lynchburg will go on without you. In my opinion Lynchburg stands for so much more than just Liberty. Just take a look around.
that flame is supposedly eternal so it could be part of a perpetual motion machine
I tell you Libertyville will be a great place to live. I can’t wait until they put the wind turbines up on god’s own mountain right above the large solar array. Hallelujah!!
Vttoa, I get your point. I wonder if LU has their own wells and sewage treatment plant or do they use the City Utilities?
Midtown,
Its not a matter of “newer model,” it’s the size of the plant (water resource). Ruesens is something like a 20 MW plant or so. Scott’s Mill would be more like 2 or 3 MW. Instead of water flowing over the dam like it does now, it would be diverted through a building next to the dam that’s probably between 50 to 100 ft square or so, and then the water would return back to the river. There will be some power lines coming from the building. That’s pretty much it. 2 MW is worth developing if done right (couple thousand homes worth of power). But if Liberty has to spend $10 million on lawyers and engineering firms, it definitely won’t pay.
And ugly? Are you serious? There’s a quarter mile long pipe plant or something that’s not going to go anywhere at the site right now, and its next to the railroad. Where’s the beauty to preserve?
Oh, and I’m with jouxster about voicing your opinion on how it looks. Write the city, since they will be involved, and tell them as a resident you would like them to ask whichever developer gets the permit to make sure the building looks nice and that there is some nice parking and fishing access or whatever. I doubt any developer is going to care a bit about putting in a small parking area and some benches. That’s cheap compared to the rest of it.
Liberty Law Student
I’m glad that recycling and energy conservation is practiced at LU ! I know that LC and Randolph encourage recycling and I would assume they encourage energy conservation as well. Of course they won’t have the tonage LU does because they are much smaller. Thanks for letting me know.
I would like to respond to Midtown Business’ rhetorical question of whether LU encourages students to “recycle, drive less, and turn down the heat?“
Liberty has recycling bins at numerous locations on campus. In 2008 the student body recycled over 3,469 TONS of material (http://www.liberty.edu/financeadmin/fieldoperations/index.cfm?PID=16390). There is even a student group called “Care for Creation” that promotes more earth-friendly habits. You should look into how much recycling the other area colleges have done. Liberty is doing a good job here.
Also, Liberty has a great bus service now that takes students around campus and also to various shopping centers and apartment complexes around the city so that students do not need to drive. Additionally, Liberty has a park-and-ride program as well as a carpooling program (http://www.liberty.edu/index.cfm?PID=12354).
I think it is great that Liberty is considering various alternative, renewable sources of energy. Although I doubt this specific hydroelectric idea will come to fruition, I have great hopes that there will soon be solar panels on top of the campus buildings in the near future.
Historically correct? By whose standards? I have seen tons of dams, each different and interesting. The ug factor comes in the power conversion/transmission part with lines and such. Sometimes you have to deal with ug to create energy.
Which is uglier: wind turbines (which look like rotating cell phone towers many people find ugly, Solar Panels, not pretty if birds are nearby.
You really do hate Liberty. Man I have never seen someone so ticked off at Jerry’s kids! The oil rig in production here in central Virginia was last in operation back in never. Maybe Liberty will start putting up Wind Turbines all over Candler Mountain. Then what? Will you complain then too?
And the answer is: Yes You Will
Cause even though people voted for change.. they don’t like it unless it’s somewhere else.
And you will still hate Liberty. If you don’t like Reusen’s designs then volunteer another design. I’ve always found if you work with people and give them a better option they take it.
Excuse me jouxster. I retract my statement. I’ve been familar with Reusens for over 50 years and I did not realize it was hydropower.It’s really ugly.
Maybe you can answer this question…Are the newer models small enough that it will fit inside a historically correct building? I might be wrong but when Scotts Mill Dam is not overflowing I see old stacked rocks
carved into an extra large cinder block size rather than concrete.
Yes I am for green energy such as geo thermal, wind, and solar. There must be a better way than the ugly Reusens look, especially since Scotts Mill Dam has been there for 260 years and looks great. I’m looking for options.
By the way didn’t everyone’s electric bill increase radically then it was partially credited back later. What about gas and oil? I haven’t seen any oil wells on Candlers Mountain. Does LU even encourage students to recycle, drive less, and turn down the heat?

Advertisement