Parking changes could hit downtown streets

» 10 Comments | Post a Comment

The city expects to begin introducing paid parking to the streets of downtown Lynchburg as early as next spring or summer.

A tentative timeline suggests that electronic pay stations — not unlike the one already installed in the midtown parking deck — could start arriving around that time. The machines would be phased in throughout downtown over a period of three years, according to the schedule, which is still subject to change.

The exact nature of the future parking system has not yet been decided. Officials are currently soliciting proposals for a new parking management system. The deadline for vendors to submit a proposal is Sept. 29.

Lynchburg’s transition to paid downtown parking was recommended by a 2007 study and has been a goal of city administration ever since. The plan is designed to get longer-term visitors out of the district’s on-street parking and into off-street lots and decks. The more convenient curbside spaces would then be freed up for shoppers.

Today, City Council will be asked to make a series of amendments to the parking code in order to bolster the downtown plans.

If approved, the changes would take effect Jan.1.

The changes, recommended by the Lynchburg Parking Authority, include new provisions for the looming paid parking system and increases to various fines and fees.

In earlier discussions, parking authority members agreed that the city’s current fines and fees were out-of-date and insufficient to prod drivers into compliance with the new parking regulations.

Under the terms of the proposed revisions, which will be considered by council during a meeting tonight, the $10 fine for parking past the specified time limit will rise to $20. The $20 fine for parking in prohibited areas will rise to $30.

If approved, this will mark the first time these fines have been adjusted in more than 10 years.

Bigger bumps would be seen in the permit fees charged for residential parking. Currently, a downtown resident whose building doesn’t provide any parking can make use of city space for an annual fee of $3.

The code amendments suggest that fee be pushed to $15 a year for certain areas of Church and Court streets and $300 for the rest of the designated downtown central business district.

The reason for that discrepancy in price was not immediately clear.

The amendments also create a section addressing the future paid parking stations. The added language requires compliance with pay station rules and prohibits vandalism of the machines.

Other notable changes include the striking of a section that gives special parking leeway to jurors reporting to one of the downtown courthouses. Moving forward, the city expects jurors to make use of normal public parking, including long-term spaces available in the Clay Street deck, said parking manager Norman Hale.

It is not clear how much money the city has to pay for any future parking improvements. In 2007, officials had a cache of $250,000 to support the downtown work. Since then, that money has been tapped to fund the parking study, the parking manager’s salary and benefits, and the installation of a temporary pay station in the midtown parking deck.

City officials were unsure Monday how much money remains in the parking fund.

Under the tentative schedule outlined in the city’s 22-page request for parking proposals, officials indicate they hope to sign a contract for a new system by mid-January and begin installing new pay stations as early as the end of April.

The specifications detailed in the request leave some room for vendors to suggest the exact nature of the system, although the city does insists on certain things, such as a fully electronic system capable of accepting payment through cash, credit card, cell phone or special tokens that can be sold to individuals and merchants.

The request does not demand the system be able to provide the first hour of parking free. Officials have suggested in the past that some type of complimentary period would be offered under any new system.

Council will consider the suggested amendments to the parking ordinance during a meeting at 7:30 p.m. today in City Hall, 900 Church St.

A work session will also be held today in the same location at 5 p.m. Topics will include the much-debated big-box ordinance, which seeks to more closely regulate the construction of large retail stores.

Advertisement

 
View More: lynchburg,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by mrlegoman on September 23, 2009 at 1:03 pm

I hate the idea of going downtown to have a nice dinner and continually having to worry if the meter is going to run out.
Local business’s listen up, the first time I leave your establishment 5 minutes too late and find a 20$ ticket on my window will be the last time I visit downtown.

Flag Comment Posted by Lynchburg Native on September 22, 2009 at 2:12 pm

So the City thinks having to pay to park will attract people to downtown??  LOL, LOL, LOL

Flag Comment Posted by In The Middle on September 22, 2009 at 11:44 am

I believe the city is making a big mistake.  People need attractions for downtown, not hindrances.

Flag Comment Posted by midtown on September 22, 2009 at 10:58 am

Paul, your memory is incomplete. It’s true that businesses come and go, especially the small businesses that characterize downtown, but there are quite a few that have opened in the past few years, and there are several building projects underway downtown. Just go down Main St. and see. Just to name a few: Rising Up (the climbing place), Waterstone Pizza and Shoemakers, a couple of coffeehouses, Bittersweet/Folk, a Caribbean place on Church, and numerous apartments. Also, there’s a cafe/grocery going in in the old CVS, and there are a few places under construction on Commerce.

Also remember, not all is well elsewhere. We all know about Wyndhurst, but have you been to the mall recently? The name-brand stores are slowly leaving and being replaced with discount stores, the last life cycle of a mall. Candler’s Station is also hurting with several big places leaving there and, again, being replaced by discount-oriented stores. The old Circuit City building there has been vacant for years. There have been vacancies down Wards Road, also. Problems are all around, although the chains can withstand tough times better.

Having said that, I think downtown isn’t ready for paid parking meters and the city has wasted money on the parking director position and the study. I mean, $10 for parking is obviously not enough; just make it $20-30 and forego the study.

Flag Comment Posted by Vahomboy on September 22, 2009 at 7:42 am

Posted by ( m.paul.valois ) on September 22, 2009 at 8:20 am

“So what’s opened in the last two years?“

Ooooo! Ooooo! I know!  Pick me!

The traffic circle on 5th….?

Flag Comment Posted by m.paul.valois on September 22, 2009 at 7:20 am

Claire wrote” “Businesses are closing all over downtown?  I was down there the last 2 weekends and I saw the opposite.  There are new businesses opening regularly.“

CVS = Closed
Weenie Stand = Closed
Home = Closed
Waterfalls = Closed
Half the stores in the Atrium = Closed
Academy Cafe = Closed
La Allegre = Closed

So what’s opened in the last two years?

Flag Comment Posted by Clare378 on September 22, 2009 at 6:48 am

Businesses are closing all over downtown?  I was down there the last 2 weekends and I saw the opposite.  There are new businesses opening regularly.
And to have parking spaces “freed” (made available) for shoppers - even at a small charge - is a great thing!  Those who live or work downtown should not be taking up on-street spots.

Flag Comment Posted by BifDBanzai on September 22, 2009 at 3:34 am

Paul @ 11:19 pm: “So we have a well-paid Parking Czar to make sure there enough empty spaces in front of Lynchburg’s businesses ....“

This would never have happened if they had taken my advice and hired a parking TSAR instead.

Flag Comment Posted by oldman66 on September 22, 2009 at 12:48 am

It’s all about how much revenue this little brain fart will generate for the city. They’re bankrupt; they just won’t admit it.

Flag Comment Posted by m.paul.valois on September 21, 2009 at 10:19 pm

Let’s read this one again:

“The plan is designed to get longer-term visitors out of the district’s on-street parking and into off-street lots and decks. The more convenient curbside spaces would then be freed up for shoppers.“

Excuse me… Did you say “Freed”?

How exactly does having to pay “free” up something that used to cost no money?

So we have a well-paid Parking Czar to make sure there enough empty spaces in front of Lynchburg’s businesses, and the city has blown through a quarter of million dollars to solve a parking problem that it didn’t have…  To do what, exactly?

Businesses are closing all over downtown, and our leaders think that shoppers will be lured from safe, free parking at the stores on Wards Road to haul down the Expressway to the meager shops left open among the dingy and dilapidated shuttered businesses…  Lured there by the prospect of having to pay for parking?

THIS is the master plan?

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement