Rustburg farm takes hit from souring milk prices
Milk Prices
Local dairy farmers are feeling the sqeeze as the sour economy lowers milk prices
Photo by Kim Raff/The News & Advance
Mariela Sanchez attaches pumps to the udders of cows while milking them at the Seven Oaks Farm in Rustburg..
On Carter Elliott’s Rustburg farm, milking his 420 dairy cows three times a day means his operation runs almost around the clock.
The milk is sent at least every other day by tanker truck to a processing plant in South Carolina, where it’s pasteurized, homogenized and sent out for drinking.
But while his herd keeps doing its job, the price Elliott is paid for their work has plummeted.
Prices just set for March by the State Milk Commission, which regulates pricing in the dairy industry based on a complex formula, could mean farmers receive less than $1 per gallon — prices last seen in 1995.
A combination of factors, from diminished consumption in foreign markets to increased U.S. production, has caused dairy prices to plunge and left farmers like Elliott struggling.
In addition to some farmers culling their herd, which means financial recovery from producing milk would take longer, some may “just exit the business,” said Tony Banks, the assistant director of commodity marketing with the Virginia Farm Bureau. “2003 was bad and we lost lot of dairy farms in Virginia at that time, but this year it’s worse because that cost-price squeeze is even greater,” he said.
Over the past three years, fertilizer prices have more than doubled and feed prices have shot up, Banks said. “When farm commodity prices started to really increase, a lot of the (production) prices went up right behind them.”
Factors affecting milk prices include reduced demand from the restaurant business here at home. But the largest one, Banks said, is that global demand for dairy has plummeted while supply has increased.
In recent years, global prosperity meant that certain Asian countries such as China and India were purchasing many more dairy products for consumption or manufacturing. That increase in demand coupled with severe droughts in major U.S. competitor milk-producing regions such as Australia and New Zealand meant that prices rose and American dairy farmers could increase their output and make more money, Banks said.
But the weather improved and the worldwide economy tanked, which has left supply high but demand diminished. In the U.S., Banks said about 40 percent of milk is ultimately used by the restaurant industry; however, that demand has dropped by about 30 percent in the last few months.
While there has been some increase in grocery store sales, “it hasn’t been to the extent to offset the losses from the restaurant trade,” Banks said. Additionally, he said, retail prices haven’t dropped as significantly as the price farmers get paid per gallon because of production and transportation costs.
As dairy farmers struggle to survive, so many are culling their herds that the excess cows have caused beef prices to drop. About 40 percent of beef comes from old dairy cows, which usually become hamburgers. Since September, federal livestock reports show that dairy cow slaughter is up 30 percent according to The Associated Press, while beef cow slaughter is down 14 percent.
“In farming, if one sector does good, most of the time it penalizes another sector,” Elliott said. For example, when feed prices are high, those farmers are doing well, but that impacts animal farmers purchasing the feed. “When (feed) prices drop, we enjoy it and they suffer. It’s bad that way.”
All of that contributes to why dairy farmers throughout the area and country are left trying to find a way to survive making 1995 wages and paying 2009 production prices.
For Elliott, that means looking for ways to cut costs while not culling his herd.
“The sad thing is most industries you can lay people off, but on farms you don’t have any extra people around,” he said. “And if you sell cows, you’re cutting your nose off to spite your face.”
Most costs are fixed and a culled herd still would require the same amount of labor, so the only savings would be for feed, Elliott added. “You’re just going to have to suck up and borrow money and wait until it gets better.”
Reader Reactions
OLD NEWSadvance.com
Looksee sounds like one of those PETA people. If “slurping” up mother’s milk from another animal (we are after all animals ourselves)... is disgusting, then I can only imagine the sort of nausea conjured up by eating the “MUSCLES” of other animals.
As for farmer subsidies goes, let’s just deregulate everything, it can take care of itself… just like the credit and mortgage industry did. We don’t need no government propping up anybody’s hobby farms- no sir- if they can’t make it they should just all go under. Oh and BTW- have you got YOUR potatoes in the ground yet? It may be a lean year ahead.
It’s a shame the way milk prices have went up in the last few years and the farmers who produce it are having to take less.
looksee -
If drinking milk bothers you, you definitely don’t want a full English breakfast with black pudding, or a Scottish supper including haggis ...
( Alice) point well taken, the fact still remains that Carter voted to raise our taxes in Campbell County, while our house values are going down, and i might add: we are the ONLY animal in the animal kingdom that slurps up the “mothers” milk of another animal, get a mental picture of this, it’s disgusting!
Looksee….considering what we now know about our pnut butter, lettuce, farm raised fish, etc, buying “organic” is probably smart for the few that can afford it, but for the majority of citizens not an option. The hormones in our food chain might well be a cause for the rise in the cancer rate - autism - who knows? Making ‘organic’ food products affordable, along with education regarding the health issue is imperative.
We are feeding the masses…..we see via the news and info commercials the starving children in Darfur: do you think their mothers care about organic? The burdens of being a global society are getting heavy.
So I say hats off to the Carter Elliotts of this country. And for the naysayers, i dare you to attempt to do the same thing with today’s economic challenges.
I for one , buy SILK and organic products, much healthier!
“Farm subsidies” are NOT welfare for farmers or compensation for poor management. They’re to try to share or “level out” the variables that farmers can’t control, such as weather.
Dairy farming is a hugely capital-intensive business, BUT with very variable cash-flow. Between his land, buildings, herd, and equipment, someone with 400 cows probably has $4 million dollars tied up in the means of production.
Now comes a bad year, high feed prices, drought, silage crops fail ... how does the farmer make it? We can either help him through to a better year, and pay $3.50 a gallon for milk instead of $3.00 because of subsidies, OR we can let him go out of business, sell his herd, equipment, and land ... and then when there’s almost no one left in the business, start paying $10.00 a gallon for milk from those who are starting the dairies back up and have to pay their startup production costs.
Smart people have already figured this out. We don’t have to do the experiment again by dropping the subsidies and “seeing what happens”.
I can’t imagine a harder way of making a living in this country than dairy farming. 365 days a year, up at 3 AM every morning ... I don’t see how they do it. But I do appreciate and support their effort.
I read a bumper sticker years ago and have always remembered it. I know everyone has their opinions of what he/we/she should do, should have done and so forth. Being a farmer in NO easy job. It’s 24/7/365.
Remember: Never talk about a farmer with your mouth full.
Me Epperson, are you not willing for a farm to receive $2.77 per hour to insure a safe, dependable supply of milk? Do you want to depend upon a banana republic dictator for milk for you, your children, grandchildren? Unfortunately, farms are very similar to defense contractors, you have to keep them in business. Food supply and defense are things that can not be out sourced. The start up time for these is too long to have them interrupted. Textiles, manufacturing, and other such businesses can be restarted in much shorter time frames (there are always exceptions). Supposed the French controlled our milk supply. Exactly how dependable would it be? Subject to the next French socialists election!
DEpperson should realize why farmer’s get subsidies. Our politicians know that we would be an angry mass of people if our food prices went as high as they should be so that farmer’s could make a decent return on their investment of capital and labor. Food prices are kept low to cater to the consumer bloc of voters and farmer’s are subsidized to keep them in business. There are about 1.6% of the voters in production agriculture. Farmers have no political clout anymore.
DEpperson should also know that with the farm economy over the last several years if Mr. Elliott was a poor manager there would be no article about him today. He wold have been out of business long ago.
Find us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Advertisement