Governor’s Race Devoid of Issues, Filled With Fibs
Published: September 27, 2009
Despite lacking any real fireworks, much less a discussion of the important issues facing Virginia, the gubernatorial campaign between Republican Bob McDonnell and Democrat Creigh Deeds has been a dirty one.
And mostly, the camp to blame for the grime has been Deeds.
After a come-from-behind victory over frontrunner Terry McAuliffe in the party primary primary in June following his surprise endorsement by The Washington Post, Deeds has run a lackluster campaign devoid of any real discussion of any real issues.
He ignored multiple requests from McDonnell for an expanded series of debates across the commonwealth, and he tried to change the ground rules of the debates he did agree to at the last minute.
New Feature
Sign up for our newsletter e-mailed to you at 8 a.m. each day Monday through Friday.
A 20-year-old grad school paper emerged as his main avenue of attack on McDonnell, rather than McDonnell’s own record as a legislator and attorney general. The thesis was an easier weapon to wield than the weighty issues Deeds has consistently ignored in his relatively few broader conversations with the Virginia electorate.
His television ads have been below-the-belt and beyond-the-pale attacks. The most egregious was the spot entitled “$300 Million,” which has been on a constant loop in Central and Southwest Virginia. The ad outright blames McDonnell for the increase in electricity bills that Appalachian Power Co. customers have seen in recent months, a blatant lie and distortion. Equally as disturbing, because it reveals quite a bit about the ethically challenged campaign, was the ad, again based on the infamous 20-year-old thesis, all but painting McDonnell as a knuckle-dragging Neanderthal on women’s and social issues.
Were Deeds TV ads about McDonnell the only source of information about the Republican, you would easily get the impression that McDonnell’s entire public career has been about nothing more than trying to outlaw all contraception, ban all abortions and put women “back in the kitchen.”
On the real issues, the issues that matter to Virginians, Deeds has been irritatingly silent: transportation, economic development, government reform and on and on.
That changed — sort of — this past Wednesday when The Washington Post printed an op/ed column by Deeds, touting his transportation “plan.” In the days since, it’s been hailed by his supporters as monumentally important analysis and fleshing-out of his transportation program.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
Even a cursory reading of the commentary reveals it to be little more than a rehashing of his economic and transportation platform, available for download at http://www.deedsforvirginia.com/issues.
Both the campaign’s 19-page pamphlet and the Post commentary are filled with platitudes and nice-sounding proposals — high-speed rail lines across the state to allow folks in Blacksburg to commute daily to their jobs in Northern Virginia, for example.
But there are no specifics, none at all, regarding the source of the money for his proposals. He mentions forming a bipartisan commission to examine the state’s transportation system and to recommend funding mechanisms, but that’s it.
And this is a break-through moment in the campaign?
Anyone who has followed government at any level knows that a bipartisan, blue-ribbon commission is where ideas — good, bad and indifferent — go to die a death of utter neglect.
That’s hardly leadership, Mr. Deeds. It’s copping out.
McDonnell’s transportation funding mechanisms stretch credulity almost to the breaking point, but at least he has put specifics out in the public arena for analysis. That’s more than Deeds has done ... or likely will do before Nov. 3.
Virginia needs a governor who leads from the front, not the rear. And right now, Creigh Deeds is gazing at the backsides of his followers, while Bob McDonnell is staring straight at the critical issues Virginia faces.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Wow, Cosmothe24th, sounds exactly what you are doing…knocking down someone else. You are denigrating a decent human like Pat Robertson, and then denigrating Bob McDonnell by association. Yet, no doubt you voted for Obama whose contacts are far worst for most Americans (Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers).
Also, you make completely baseless assertions; talk about having “nuttin.“ You and others on here, for example, have accused Bob McDonnell of opposing equal pay for equal work legislation. Really? Do you even know that, or are you simply parroting someone else? Truth is, the federal Equal Pay Act has been the law of the land since 1963, some 30 years before McDonnell even entered public service at the state level. It’s absolutely absurd to say McDonnell voted against equal pay legislation. If you are referring to legislation that has been introduced for years in the US Congress, but has been voted down, a lot of people oppose it because it would allow a bureaucrat to decide what constitutes “equal work.“ If the bureaucrat decides that an architect and a lawyer do “equal” work, it would force equal pay. Seems a little arbitrary to me. The Equal Pay Act to the contrary, which has been law for 46 years, forbids employers from paying two employees doing the exact same job differently simply because of gender. So what are you talking about? Or do you know?
Bob McDonnell is the only candidate offering real solutions to real issues, not manufactured red herrings like you and Creigh Deeds like to throw up. Thank goodness today’s polls show McDonnell expanding his lead.
rlmiller, if the only way you can build up McDonnell is by knocking down someone else… You got nuttin. The man is an admitted out of touch Fundamentalist who ACTUALLY believes the earth is 6000 years old! He and Pat Robertson are homophobes who would deny women equal pay for equal work AND voted against a bill that would have allowed women the right to sue in cases of sexual harassment & discrimination. If that is what you want it’s fine. Enjoy the time you have left. The kids growing up today will look on these kind of ideas as ridiculous and see characters like McDonnell the same way he sees dinosaurs on his Noah’s Ark.
Grandma… Bush couldn’t find Copenhagen on a map or pronounce it properly if he did.
These are things people like Pat Robertson do for his fellow mankind. What has Obama done to help the people who have lost everything in the floods in the south?
http://www.wtvr.com/news/dp-va—operationblessing0929sep29,0,1496000.story
Wow, what a demon. People like deeds give away tax money to ACORN and people like Mr Robertson give money to help people. Not put children into prostitution.
Headlines: President Bush goes to Copenhagen to fight for Texas to host Olympic games.
By some of the comments here, Pat Robertson must be the devil incarnate. Geezz…a God fearing, America-loving preacher is surely a man to be demonized, as is anyone who has anything to do with him even for a second, like Bob McDonnell did just by attending his university 20 years ago. Come to think of it, he’s like the nation’s evil Founding Fathers. Far better to have a man at the top who hobnobs with the likes of anti-American racist Jeremiah Wright for 20 years and unapologetic anti-American terrorist Bill Ayers. And that thesis from 20 years ago…worse by far than the admitted cocaine use by our own President. Yes, I whole-heartedly agree with the liberals’ logic here…it makes perfect sense to me!
Bob McDonnell for Governor.
My Republican dream ticket for 2012 would be all female: Sarah Palin and Carrie Prejean. Let the beauty queens takeover…
So if a woman has a strong conservative opinion, she isn’t a female? Very sexist view 24th. Very sexist. I see why you call yourself a conservative, you share a lot with Limbaugh.
There’s no 2nd chapter to “Wakefield’s Excellant Fantasy” since the USA would come to an end tout de suite in chapter one.
I think Martha said women Wakefield.
Elect all women? I would go for that in a minute! Ann Coulter would make a terrific Secretary of State. Condaleeza Rice would make an excellant President. I would like Palin as Speaker of the House. I agree with you Martha!
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Find us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Advertisement