Reforms Take a Toll on State Payday Firms

» 8 Comments | Post a Comment

When a group of state legislators gets together later this month to study the thorny issue of payday loans, it should take the final step necessary to rein in the outrageous loan industry. That step would be to return Virginia to a cap of 36 percent on open-end loans.

Even that is usurious, but it would be a vast improvement over the triple-digit interest rates that some borrowers are paying today. Unfortunately, many of those borrowers are the least able to pay sky-high interest rates.

The General Assembly has nibbled away at the payday loans in recent years, but has failed to take the step that would put them on the same playing field with other financial institutions that loan money on a short-term basis to those who need it. That step, of course, is the 36 percent interest rate cap on an annual basis — the same cap that applies to other lending institutions.

New Feature

Sign up for our newsletter e-mailed to you at 8 a.m. each day Monday through Friday.

Click here

 

Steps the lawmakers have taken, nonetheless, are beginning to show some positive results. As The Associated Press reported last week, a new law that cut down the number of payday loans borrowers can get has drastically reduced the number of short-term, high-interest loans issued in Virginia.

Last year, Virginia’s payday lenders, who are well represented in storefronts in the Lynchburg region, made about 281,000 loans per month. Through the end of May, lenders had issued an average of 45,000 loans a month — an 84 percent decline, according to the Bureau of Financial Institutions.

That puts the state on pace to issue fewer than 600,000 payday loans for the first time since the lenders were authorized to do business in the Old Dominion in 2002.

The reforms that have taken place came after years of legislative struggles among those who argued that payday lenders prey on the vulnerable and those who didn’t want to take away the fast-cash option for individuals who didn’t qualify for traditional credit.

Perhaps the most significant reforms, which became effective in January, are ones that limit borrowers to one payday loan at a time and double the amount of time borrowers have to repay the loans. Before those reforms, payday lenders charged $15 per $100 loaned and it was due on the borrowers next payday, rarely more than 30 days away. Calculated on an annual basis, that interest rate approached 400 percent.

The legislative reforms have pushed some payday lenders out of the state, including Check ‘n Go, which closed its 68 stores in Virginia earlier this year. As of the middle of June, 526 payday loan stores were still open in the state, down from a high of 832 in 2007.

The decrease in number of stores is good news, said Jay Speer, executive director of the Virginia Poverty Law Center. But there’s also some bad news, which is that some of the lenders have shifted to car-title lending.

Many of the payday lenders began offering other high-interest loans to skirt the reforms that were taking place. One of those is a car-title loan, where borrowers hand over the title to their vehicle to secure a loan for up to half the vehicle’s value. If the borrower falls behind, the lender can take the car — and along with it the only form of transportation for that family.

The solution to the problem created by payday lenders and car-title loan lenders is to cap interest rates on all those loans at 36 percent. A bill to accomplish that died in the 2009 Assembly for reasons that remain unclear.

Proponents of the measure say they will bring it back for consideration at the 2010 session. “I think the threat of us doing more in 2010 is very real,” said Del. Glen Oder, R-Newport News, who has battled the payday lenders.

For the sake of those who are least able to pay interest rates in the neighborhood of 360 percent annually, let’s hope he is right.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Arthur Pewty on July 02, 2009 at 1:25 pm

Ooooh Lani!
  Do you mean to say, “Consume lots of grains and avoid fat” did for people EXACTLY what it does for pigs and cows?

Flag Comment Posted by Lani on July 02, 2009 at 12:58 pm

As usual when it comes to those irrationally oppose the short-term lending industry, all thoughts are based on opinion and lack any real evidence as to why getting rid of the industry or applying a 36% APR is either good for consumers or the economy.  Anyone who has a lick of business sense would figure out that a 36% APR on a industry that extends extremely high risk loans to individuals who most likely aren’t able to receive short-term loans from anywhere else, would not be enough to sustain.  Historically, when the government makes brash decisions in an effort to be big brother it’s a huge disaster…like the epidemic of obesity-steming from the promotion and encouragement of individuals to consume enormous amounts of carbohydrates.

Flag Comment Posted by Imprimis on June 30, 2009 at 9:17 pm

“People are still unbanked, still have lousy credit, and still have no idea how to get out of debt.“

Easy answer to that, but no one wants to hear it.

Live within your means.  Pay debts off before buying more “stuff”.  Cancel the cell phone and cable and iTunes service.  Quit eating out so often.  Combine trips in the car. Buy the kid a baseball and bat for his birthday instead of a high-buck video game.

Problem is, our consumption-driven society often can’t conceive of doing these things, that our parents and grandparents understood so well.  They’re afraid they’ll die or something.

Flag Comment Posted by Area Mom on June 30, 2009 at 9:05 pm

Where are the positive gains for the consumer here? People are still unbanked, still have lousy credit, and still have no idea how to get out of debt. When I read articles like these about sticking it to the payday lenders, it makes me wonder if helping people was ever the real focus. There’s no evidence of this reform actually helping people, so in my mind there is no positive gains yet to be seen.

Flag Comment Posted by alder on June 26, 2009 at 2:14 pm

The reporter offers no reason why a 36% percent ban is the way to go.  I’m curious why this is the magic number.  Also, there is no description of any abuse of consumers other than generalizations that some people don’t think it’s a good financial decision.  The marketplace should regulate business practices but when there is clear abuse, reasonable regulation is ok. Also remember, a decrease in the number of stores also means an increase in unemployment.

Flag Comment Posted by Arthur Pewty on June 24, 2009 at 7:29 pm

That nefarious scalawag Mr. Imprimis and “I”,... in agreement! 

  OK, today is the 24th….  I sneezed 3 times in a row just now (felt like a bug up my nose), so that’s [03] ....  the cats been staring at me for half an hour and she has 4 paws with 5 toes each, so that’s [20]....  or should it be [10] because it’s only been half an hour…...

Flag Comment Posted by Imprimis on June 24, 2009 at 4:44 pm

That’s a good analogy.  The Lottery is the biggest government-run scam in history.

The law says that the state can ONLY inform people about the lottery through advertising.  They may NOT spend state money to advertise in order to entice people to play it.  Anybody think they’re actually doing that?  It’s a laugh.

In North Carolina, now, it’s “The Education Lottery” - all the money goes “to education”.  Hard to kick against that, eh?  But what really happens is that the amount going to eduction from the general fund is cut by the amount coming in from the lottery, so the schools actually get no more than they had before.

Virginia does everything they can do to entice, cajole, bait, and tease people into “playing the lottery”.  They KNOW, just like these Payday Loans, that the lottery is played primarily by low-income people who are spending the rent money and their kids’ lunch money to buy lottery tickets.

But the Lottery is a GREAT idea, and Payday loans are not.

What a bunch of lying, sanctimonious hypocrites our state legislators are.

Flag Comment Posted by Arthur Pewty on June 24, 2009 at 8:31 am

Doesn’t it seem just a little hypocritical for the Commonwealth to be in the Lottery business (a tax on the poor and mathematically impaired) and then get so upset when someone THEY wouldn’t lend money to has to pay a premium interest rate to borrow?
  Who picks up the slack here? 
  The high interest rate is a punishment for not running your life or household in an economically sound manner.  Is it better for all of us if people who owe money just say, “I’m just not going to pay my bills”?
  How does one teach the importance of living within ones means and the value of good credit (paying bills on time) without a system that has built in punishments and rewards? 
  So, instead of getting a Pay-Day Loan people just don’t pay their bills and buy $20 worth of Virginia State Lottery tickets instead. 
  Just what is it about the “free market” that Del. Glen Oder, R-Newport News objects to?  Is HE going to lend these people the money?  Will HE explain to the people who are owed money why they are not going to get paid?
  Perhaps he is a bankruptcy lawyer looking for business.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement