Transportation Woes Are a Danger to State’s Future
Published: June 7, 2008
Just two weeks from today, the 140 members of the General Assembly will hit the highways, heading back to the state Capitol in Richmond to tackle the commonwealth’s transportation crisis.
Gov. Timothy M. Kaine has called the Assembly back into session June 23 to take up a series of funding mechanisms to address long-term maintenance and construction needs for the state’s highway system and mass transit programs in Northern Virginia and Tidewater. Between a series of increased taxes on the sale of real estate and vehicles, a higher vehicle registration fee and a higher sales tax in Northern Virginia and Tidewater, $1 billion annually would be generated for maintenance, construction and other transportation programs.
In Richmond, however, there’s an old adage from days of yore that still holds true today: “The governor proposes; the General Assembly disposes.”
It’s the reality of Virginia politics in 2008 that with Republicans from the party’s rabidly anti-tax wing running the House of Delegates — folks like Speaker Bill Howell, Majority Leader Morgan Griffith and Del. Kirk Cox — and calling the shots, the chance of success is slim.
And that’s being optimistic.
Current estimates by planners in the Virginia Department of Transportation have the state spending all its available transportation money on maintenance by the middle of the next decade.
Think of the consequences, just here in Central Virginia, if that were to come to pass. No road widening projects, such as the work under way now on U.S. 221 in Forest. No U.S. 29 southern bypass to connect with the $220 million Madison Heights bypass, allowing interstate traffic to avoid the mess of Wards Road and opening up new parts of the region to economic development. No replacement of the aging bridges in Lynchburg or widening of highways to accommodate the phenomenal growth of Liberty University. Nothing … just a little bit of repaving here and some line-painting there.
And that’s just one little area of the state.
So-called “leaders” of the Assembly, such as Del. Griffith, don’t see that there’s a transportation problem at all, at least one that’s statewide in scope and in need of a statewide solution. They just don’t seem to care that Northern Virginia and Tidewater, the economic drivers of the rest of the state, are in states of emergency when it comes to transportation. It doesn’t seem to bother them one whit that the day is quickly coming when those two regions will simply exercise the political power they already possess and divert as much transportation money as they need to their regions, to the detriment of everyone else. Southwest, Southside and Central Virginia left out in the political desert? Who cares, certainly not folks like the majority leader and the speaker.
The response of many Republican legislators to the governor’s proposal is a terse “No.” Many don’t see, or are blind to, the statewide maintenance crisis that’s looming a few years out. Others, while grudgingly admitting there’s a “slight” problem, say the money could be found by “cutting fraud and wasteful spending.” Push them a little further, in an effort to get specifics from them, and you’ll hit a brick wall. They either don’t know (which is sad), or they know it would be their sacred political cows (even sadder).
Business groups from across the state recognize the scope of the problem, even if Richmond’s anti-taxers don’t. Chambers of commerce from Northern Virginia and the Shenandoah Valley to the capital and Tidewater have urged the Assembly to work with the governor to craft a solution as quickly as possible. The state’s business leaders know that gridlock — politically in Richmond and literally on the state’s highways — serves no one.
Here’s what Clayton Roberts Jr., leader of the business-friendly Virginia Foundation for Research and Economic Education, told The Washington Post last week: “The business community is out of patience, and certainly there will be consequences (if nothing passes) … . We’ll fix it at the ballot box.”
It’s not a joke, Mr. Majority Leader. It’s not a threat, Mr. Speaker. It’s simply a fact that people who care about this commonwealth and its future are fed up with “leaders” whose vocabulary begins and ends with the word “No” and who refuse to lead.
Why the House Republicans aren’t listening to them — and in all likelihood won’t — is simply unfathomable.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Interesting name…. ![]()
Cosmo - the problem de-jure is not only what our policy should be with regard to roads or mass transit but more to the point - where would you get the funding and how would you allocate it to the places that want and need it.
My basic point was that money does not come from the “State” which often seems to be what many folks think when they say they need more road funding.
But whether it is road funding or mass transit funding - in the end - the amount of money that a place like Lynchburg will get for transportation won’t be much more than what it’s own people pay for…
Money does not come from other jurisdictions - no more than Lynchburg would like it if it’s collected taxes were sent to other jurisdictions to spend on transportation.
Anyone who thinks they are going to build roads or mass transit in their area with money from somewhere else is dreaming… it’s gonna come from you.
So.. if you want Mass Transit - get ready to open your wallet.
I agree.. that highway funding is confusing to the public but it’s pretty simple in the whole.
If the Lynchburg Area has a very expensive project - they can save up for it.. by not spending their annual allocation or they can borrow from another locality but they’ll have to pay it back at some point by forgoing other funding and projects in the future.
In the end, Lynchburg is only going to get - they are only entitled to - what their own folks pay for gas taxes.
Why would/should they expect MORE than what they pay into it and why would they expect other cities and towns to collect gas money from their own folks and give it to Lynchburg?
I don’t think this is complicated at all unless one believes in tooth fairies and money trees.
Some money.. IS collected from every person across the Commonwealth to go into building roads that connect Va… that don’t serve any one community but serve all Virginian’s when they need to go from point a to point b.
But local or regional projects?
Why would anyone expect folks from other localities and regions to pay taxes to build Lynchburgs projects?
The Editorial Writers here could do a tremendous public service is they simply told their readers this basic fundamental reality and do not perpetuate a perspective about funding that is simply not true…
Once everyone gets to understand that you get what you pay for - we might all decide how much we REALLY need verses what we’d want if someone else was paying.
and yes.. the other part of this is when an area gets “grant” funding .. it IS like taking from other localities especially when you take a grant and spend it in ways that you might not if you were actually spending your own money.
The only thing “complicated” about highway funding in my view the media basically perpetuating the idea that money for roads comes from the ‘state’ instead of where it really comes from.
There seems to be lot of confusion about the funding of highway projects. There should be, it’s confusing as heck, but the purpose of paying taxes and the funding of highway projects by the feds is that it’s known that no locality can afford the cost of a major project. This is evidence that there are some things done better by the state and federal governments. The state does bear the major load. It always comes down to the proper stewardship of these funds. I don’t mind paying taxes, but I get sick of stupid politicians and bureaucrats wasting it.
Last week there was an article that the city received over $300K from the state for public transportation. The money was for GLTC. What is the city doing with the money? Hiring more cops. If that isn’t a waste of money I don’t know what it. Right now there are over 40 cops per shift. I wasn’t aware that we were in the middle of a crime spree or that the police were being overworked.
I have absolutely no allegiance at all with the “no mo tax” folks but on the other hand those that believe that funding comes from some place else besides their own pockets, in my view, are no better off in their logic either.
And I am not convinced that there is any more waste, fraud and abuse in highway funding than anything else that is tax funded either.
If we believe VDOT and Kaine, and this paper - there is a need for more funding.
Fair enough.
Now, let’s talk about how much you and I want to pay.
One penny on the gas tax will generate 50 million dollars - STATEWIDE.
Tell me again how much one penny in the gas tax will generate in the Lynchburg Area and what the price of these projects that you advocate building - are.
Then we can figure out how much we want to pay - rather than talk about Richmond “funding” transportation.
Let’s just shuck the smoke & mirrors no matter what side of the tax issue one is on and be honest about the solutions.
If we want more ..we’re going to have to no only pay more but a LOT more if we are after the projects advocated.
It is always so easy to blame the Republicans, the “anti-tax” crowd. As I see it, there is enough blame to go around, spread almost evenly. Do we need more funds for highways-Yes! So, where do these funds come from? Cutting fraud and wasteful spending is a good idea. So, maybe, is a small increase in taxes for vehicle related sales and activities. Better idea-lockbox all state income related to vehicles, that is fuel taxes, sales taxes, parts and component taxes, etc into mandatory VDOT financing. At least this way we will know exactly how much income the state receives from transportation, and therefor how much to allocate to VDOT. Then, maybe fund special projects, big ones like bridges or non-highway transportation, by a seperate authorization outside this lockbox. Routine allocation of the lockbox funds is a subject for another time, but this idea will at least allow VDOT some breathing room, for now.
So - here’s the question.
Why should the Lynchburg Area (or any area in Va) expect more funds from the state for transportation than what the taxpayers in the Lynchburg Area would themselves generate?
In other words.. is there an expectation that when the state funds transportation that it would get the additional money from somewhere other than the Lynchburg area?
is there an expectation that such funds would come from the State “money tree” or from other taxpayers in Va other than those living in Lynchburg?
You know.. when the State “funds” transportation.. despite many who think otherwise.. the money comes from taxpayers…
is there a need?
I’m sure.. but who decides the “need” and who pays for it?
My thought is that if Lynchburg has a “need”.. why would Lynchburg expect Charlottesville or Roanoke citizens to pay for that “need” instead of themselves?
Find us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Advertisement