Letters to the Editor for Monday, December 1, 2008

» 25 Comments | Post a Comment

Deflation would have dire consequences
The Federal Reserve members are waking up to the real danger to our economy.

Letters to the editorClick to send

This week’s drop in the consumer price index has raised the specter of “deflation.” Deflation is when money gets scarce and, therefore, more valuable. The price of goods will fall to try to match the new reality, but deflation is the enemy of anyone who has a lot of debt to service. Debt service is agreed upon for the long term and as money gets scarcer it just becomes more difficult.

It shouldn’t be a surprise to government regulators that deflation was a distinct possibility; it wouldn’t have been had they been looking at the middle class. For years, while the administration unsuccessfully practiced trickle-down economics with their tax cuts for the rich, the members of the middle class were losing earning power and asset value. Trillions of dollars of middle-class assets have disappeared with the housing and stock market collapses. Most members of the middle class have no purchasing power left when they consider their debt load. They are now against the wall, looking for food and shelter, the basics only. Trying to keep the kids fed and warm.

The corporations and governments who need the middle class’ money to service their own debts may also get caught up in this deflationary price spiral. Without significant changes, expect massive cuts in the amount of stuff on the store shelves and in the government’s bag of services as these entities begin to suffer along with the middle class.

The solution is to get money to the middle class while at the same time building an economy and infrastructure that is appropriate to the world in which we live. Middle-class debt should be on the government’s front burner.

Building a sustainable economy based on community principles with distributed and renewable energy sources and high-speed information services for every U.S. household could be the work projects that supply the wages that make our country a better place to live with a working economy again. The sooner this can be started, the less deflation we will have to contend with.
MICHAEL TABONY
Gladstone

Keep it blocked
In response to a Nov. 26 letter about the blocked lane on the overpass where Timberlake Road crosses the Expressway, I think it’s safer with the lane remaining blocked permanently. I have used this overpass five days a week for seven years. The problem I have experienced is the traffic coming onto Timberlake Road East from the Expressway uses the closed lane for an acceleration lane and refuses to yield to eastbound traffic on Timberlake Road that desires to exit onto 501 North. I’ve had many near misses trying to exit onto 501 North from Timberlake Road.
RALPH SHEPARD
Lynchburg

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Individualist on December 01, 2008 at 5:42 pm

Fred, I guess Nixon could have ordered everyone out by Friday, or what ever day he wanted, without taking any logistics into account.
I want to see how Obama does it. If he does it.

Flag Comment Posted by Individualist on December 01, 2008 at 5:37 pm

eveinthesky, I guess if you lost three limbs, it atomatically means you are unable, to be soft on defense? How about the draftees who did not want to be there to begin with? All hawks today, huh?

Flag Comment Posted by Fred on December 01, 2008 at 5:12 pm

Indy,

De Gaulle told JFK to stay out of Vietnam. Why is it that ignorant and arrogant Americans never listen to the French (who had been there, done that and got booted out!)? I was still in France when General Giap crushed the French at Dien Bien Phu. He then went on to teach the Americans a lesson or two! 

If memory serves me right, Nixon campaigned on a promise to end the war and let it go on another 6 or 7 years. Did he also lie about invading Cambodia? No wonder he was called Tricky Dick!

Flag Comment Posted by eyeinthesky on December 01, 2008 at 4:53 pm

Nonpc,
Certainly, draft dodgers can be found in both parties. But you either missed or ignored the point: Max Cleland served, and gave two legs and an arm for our country, and the Republicans tried to paint him as soft on national security.
That’s typical Republican-brand scum tactics. Try to get the point next time, and not just rush to defend the Republicans or accuse the Democrats

Flag Comment Posted by Individualist on December 01, 2008 at 4:44 pm

Ah, who sent the first troops to Viet Nam, and who brought them out?

Flag Comment Posted by Fred on December 01, 2008 at 4:38 pm

nonpc,

Vietnam was an illegal and immoral war, based on lies, much like Iraq. I have a great textbook used at the West Point Academy that explains that point very nicely. Would you care to borrow it? Or, how about reading the Pentagon Papers?

Anybody AGAINST that war had a moral duty to avoid it. All the Republicans who were FOR it and nevertheless did all they could for not going were just plain cowards. And that includes Bush, Cheney, Chambliss, etc.

Flag Comment Posted by Fred on December 01, 2008 at 4:22 pm

Speaking of grasping the difference, I wonder if right-wingers understand the difference between Obama and their Macho-in-Chief (who masquerades as President)? No wonder poor Barbara got a perforated ulcer. Any mother with a son like hers is entitled to at least one ulcer!

Flag Comment Posted by nonpc on December 01, 2008 at 4:14 pm

By the way, eyeinthesky Joe Biden has Chambliss beat, Biden received five student draft deferments during the Vietnam War, the same as Dick Cheney. 125,000 Americans outright dodged the draft by hiding in Canada, Half returned to the U.S. when Jimmy Carter granted them amnesty in 1977. Bill dodged the draft and Hillary voted for the war.
Cowardice doesn’t follow party lines fellas, nice try though.

Flag Comment Posted by Fred on December 01, 2008 at 3:46 pm

Is nonpc a mac?

Flag Comment Posted by Fred on December 01, 2008 at 3:28 pm

chick,

All the yellow-bellied Republicans were FOR the war, Bill Clinton was AGAINST it. Do you grasp the difference?

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement