Letters to the Editor for Sunday, November 8, 2009

» 63 Comments | Post a Comment

Writer: This was not democracy at work
The other night on the evening news we listened to Jerry Falwell Jr. say of this election, “That’s how democracy works. If people don’t like it, then that’s … sorry.”

Such arrogance! At least he had the sense to bite his own tongue and not say “then that’s too bad.”

The student voters at Liberty University, excused from classes for the day and bused by the university to the polling place to cast their votes for Scott Garrett, have completely usurped the will of the people of Lynchburg.

Del. Shannon Valentine was defeated by a margin far smaller than the number of votes cast by the Liberty voters; indeed she was ahead in the race and was expected to win until the votes from the precinct where the students vote were counted. Only then did the vote total turn to Garrett. One female Liberty student was interviewed on camera and admitted “I live in Delaware, but I’m voting here.”

When citizens who are not and never intend to be residents of a given community can be used by an institution in that community to usurp the will of the legitimate citizen residents … no Mr. Falwell, that is not “how democracy works.”

One of democracy’s greatest failings, and this event is a perfect illustration of that failing, is that democracy relies in part on the basic integrity of the citizenry not to abuse their rights in order to force their views on other citizens.

Men and women of integrity understand that each of us is charged to use our one vote to better our own community; not to cast that vote in a community other than that which we consider our home and for the sole purpose of putting into power the candidate who favors the institution which has encouraged us to do so. The institution who has so encouraged a voter to misuse his or her right to vote lacks any semblance of integrity, as do the students who allowed themselves to be so used. Liberty University and all who are or have ever been affiliated with it should be ashamed; the true citizens of the 23rd House District should be outraged!

LU is in essence an employer; they employee young people as students. How is it anything but a bastardization of the intent of the Founding Fathers when an employer in a community is able to use its employees to determine the outcome of local politics, not in the community those employees call home, but in the community where the employer has a vested interest?

No Mr. Falwell, that is not “how democracy works.” Shame on you, and shame on your students who have allowed themselves and their voting rights to be used to further your aims; used to usurp the rights of the true citizens of the community where they are simply employed.
LIB ELDER
Pamplin

 

Immature voting
The day after our recent election, I attended the electoral board canvas of voting results as a designated observer.

It was appropriate to observe this canvas because of the close results in the 23rd District House of Delegates race and the extended length of time it took to receive results from Heritage Elementary School precinct where a large number of students from Liberty University voted. When the result of these precinct votes were analyzed by the board during this canvass, it was noted that an unusually high number of “write in” votes were cast.

A review of these “write in” votes by the board indicated that most of these votes were cast for a variety of cartoon and religious characters. It should be noted here that the chief election official in each precinct is obligated to manually record each “write in” vote on appropriate summary forms before submitting results to the board on election night. The very large number of “write in” votes from this precinct required several pages of hand-written votes be prepared before the final precinct results could be submitted. The chairman of the electoral noted with some dismay the difficulties that frivolous write in voting such as this can cause.

The privilege of safe and secure voting we enjoy in this country require each voter to exercise their right to vote in a mature and responsible manner. The results of the election in this precinct with regard to write-in voting did not reflect the maturity we need in this community. This observation was made by observers representing both parties in this election.
BOB KNODEL
Lynchburg

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Scoop Malone on November 08, 2009 at 10:05 pm

Lin Yutang @ 7:00 am : “The first hen that cackles is the one that laid the egg.“

In America we say, “he who smelt it, dealt it.“

Flag Comment Posted by Fred on November 08, 2009 at 9:56 pm

Honorable Lin,

That’s why the French had to come in and finish the job.

Did you ever hear about Yorktown in Chinese schools? Here very little true.

Flag Comment Posted by Reality Check on November 08, 2009 at 9:20 pm

Honorable Lin, 

Excuse my attempt to educate you in American history but preachers of the gospel led the abolitionist (anti-slavey) movement in the US and Great Britain.  William Wilberforce (sp?), a minister and a politician, and Charles Finney are a couple of names that come to mind. Quakers were pacifists and most refused to allow their sons to fight the British for freedom.

Flag Comment Posted by hardcore on November 08, 2009 at 8:57 pm

No Lin.  I don’t think he went to school in New Jersey.

Flag Comment Posted by Lin Yutang on November 08, 2009 at 8:10 pm

Honorable Reality Check,

  Please excuse question. 

Where you learn history?  From crazy person?

Flag Comment Posted by Reality Check on November 08, 2009 at 8:04 pm

Martha, the Quakers might have been against slavery but most Christian denominations were.  The Quakers left to hide out west because they refused to fight in the Revolutionary War.  That didn’t sit too well with the citizens here who did send their sons to war.

Flag Comment Posted by Martha on November 08, 2009 at 7:30 pm

Reality Check,

Ironic…I just watched ....just now finished…Iron Jawed Angels about Alice Paul and Lucy Burns. Fascinating movie about women’s suffrage.
President Wilson approved of the movement to allow states to ratify the vote for women NOT an amendment to the Constitution. In the end public pressure and the unconstitutional imprisonment of Suffrage leaders on trumped up charges and their brutal treatment in a Women’s prison right here in VA caused him to endorse an amendment. Tennessee was the final state to qualify the amendment.
Women, when they vote, almost always vote Democratic…by a large %.
I have no idea what Lynchburg natives approved of back then but Carter Glass was the first head of the Federal Reserve bank and Lynchburg has always been pretty conservative.
The ironic thing is that Lynchburg was founded by a Quaker and then Quakers left the area because they were ridiculed for their stance against slavery.
How’s that for a tiny bit of history?
Has anyone talked to Helgeson yet?Just curious.

Flag Comment Posted by Lin Yutang on November 08, 2009 at 7:11 pm

Honorable Fred,

  Much easier to see dirt on neighbors neck than own.

Honorable Reality Check,

  Please excuse.  Woman and Blacks denied right to vote anywhere.  Not so students. 
  Society decide nothing.  People free to choose for self what tolerate and what conserve.  Only dead man and fool tolerate everything.  So sorry.

Flag Comment Posted by Fred on November 08, 2009 at 6:22 pm

Honorable Lin,

Why is it that “patriotic” Americans have such a hard time owning up to their never-ending crimes?
Because they are Christians (82% of them claim to be)?

Flag Comment Posted by Reality Check on November 08, 2009 at 6:13 pm

Just for fun, someone should research the News Advance archives for editorials written when black people and women were given the right to vote in past centuries.  I bet Lynchburg opponents of women and blacks voting were using arguments similar to those that Lib Elder and the liberal commentators on this board are using to oppose college students voting locally.  Anyone have time to do some research?  I would not be surprised if you found editorials arguing that women just don’t understand politics or blacks will be unduly influenced by their pastors or churches when they vote.  Have we really progressed as a society or are we just oppressing different groups?  Now, instead of oppressing groups based on race and sex, we have decided as a society that it is ok to malign and denigrate certain students if their religious beliefs happen to be conservative-leaning.  FOLKS, BIGOTRY IS BIGOTRY, WHETHER IT IS BASED ON RACE, SEX OR RELIGION.  YOU ARE NOT “TOLERANT” IF YOU ARE MERELY CHOOSING WHAT GROUPS SHOULD BE TOLERATED.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.
 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement