Letters to the Editor for Tuesday, October 13, 2009

» 53 Comments | Post a Comment

Writer: Garrett misrepresents facts
On several occasions, Scott Garrett has intentionally misrepresented Shannon Valentine’s positions. He has said that, in response to the 2009 Virginia FREE questionnaire, she supported increasing gasoline taxes, creating a new sales tax on gasoline, creating a new tax on auto repair services and establishing new toll roads on existing interstate and primary highways, possibly including U.S. 460 and U.S. 29. Not only has she not supported these taxes, but Clayton Roberts, president of Virginia FREE, confirms she has not.

Toward helping candidate Garrett get his facts straight, we are forwarding this quote from Clayton Roberts, president of Virginia FREE:

“The Virginia FREE candidate questionnaire, and Delegate Valentine’s positions on that questionnaire, apparently are being misrepresented by her opponent. The questionnaire does not ask candidates whether they would support tax increases for transportation. To assert otherwise is deliberately misleading. The questionnaire seeks to establish a starting point for continuing the dialog with state leaders on issues that are important to business and job creation in Virginia. It is unfortunate that Delegate Valentine’s opponent did not even bother to answer the questionnaire.” 

We cannot condemn a candidate for not understanding his opponent’s positions, but to misrepresent them, intentionally and repeatedly, is unacceptable. We have learned we can always believe Shannon Valentine. We have also learned we must seriously question her opponent when he tells us what she has done. This is not the only reason I will vote for Shannon Valentine, but it is reason enough.
KAY GANTT
Lynchburg

 

For Valentine
After reading Steve Troxel’s Oct. 12 letter in support of Scott Garrett, I am amazed that we were both at the same meeting.

What I got from Garrett were generalities and misrepresentations of the facts, and what I got from Del. Shannon Valentine was a clear grasp of the situations that face Central Virginians, and a committment to continue her excellent record of representing us in these difficult times.

As for the Virginia FREE questionaire, the point to be made at the end of the day is that the Highway Trust Fund has been raided for many years to replace budget shortfalls to the tune of more than a billion dollars. At some point we have to either address this by dedicating a revenue source to the maintenance of our states’ highways that cannot be raided, or we will have our highways handed back to the localities where we will see our property taxes raised exponentially to pay for them. At some point, we have to actually deal with situations, rather than handing them off to the next election cycle.

Valentine demonstrated in great detail work she is involved with on the job creation, education and tranportation fronts that are serving us well and will continue to do so.

Her blunt admonition that nobody in his right mind would increase anyone’s taxes in this economic environment, and the proof of the tax cuts she has sponsored or supported in her record of representing us speaks for itself.

We now need leadership which garners a thorough knowledge and honest assessment of the challenges which face us, and then meet them with the intelligence and innovation that she has already demonstrated in only her first two years.

I invite every citizen to look to the future in November and send the representative best suited to meet it on our behalf: Del. Shannon Valentine.
MICHAEL A. WHORLEY
Lynchburg

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Fred on October 14, 2009 at 8:18 am

1/3 of Americans is overweight, one third obese (many grotesquely and morbidly). Obviously, God is providing his blessings to those deserving Americans (most of them Christians).

According to UN figures released today, 1 billion people (1/6 of the world population) goes hungry everyday.
Will God provide for those too?

Flag Comment Posted by shoebox on October 14, 2009 at 5:22 am

shadow, if you want info on false prophets you would get more at the logo-on-the-hill side of town than on 5th street.

Flag Comment Posted by shoebox on October 14, 2009 at 5:16 am

Thank you Fred

Flag Comment Posted by Fred on October 13, 2009 at 9:36 pm

Randolph,

Aren’t you repeating yourself?

Then let me repeat myself:

A handful of eagles,
Tens of millions of dodo birds (so many on this forum)!

Just for your information, the US is the number one weapons manufacturer and dealer in the world. In other words, the number one agent of destruction and death in the world. If the US military-industrial complex were to shut down, this country would collapse.

Think about it and then go to bed. I have a few things to tell you tomorrow.

Sweet dreams!

Flag Comment Posted by Randolph Knipp on October 13, 2009 at 9:16 pm

I just am not into bashing my country, Packer.  When I see statements that I wonder about, I like to check them out.  Many such claims that we are at the bottom of the rung prove to be wrong.  I don’t think that the United States is always number one, but I love my country, and I’d like to instill that love in others, and my heart does swell with pride when so many Nobel awards come to Americans, even when so many of those recipients are immigrants!  I am proud that they immigrated to our country, all of them, even the Kenyan.  (Just joking, for Pete’s sake!)

Flag Comment Posted by GOP2009 on October 13, 2009 at 8:08 pm

What I cannot figure out is why the Christians do not band together and stop advertising and purchasing the N&A.

They would be making a choice to not help others slander them.

Flag Comment Posted by The Shadow on October 13, 2009 at 7:54 pm

Matt,

Fred posts the same tired stuff day after day.  How is that not spam?

Why do you hold him to a different standard and allow his hate speech against Christians?

Oh wait, I guess I just answered my own question.

Flag Comment Posted by Fred on October 13, 2009 at 7:09 pm

2dogs,

Agreed. One hundred percent.

Our good friend, Theodore Hannon (on the Planning Commission), has declared on this forum that “sustainability” is an attack on the “sanctity” (no less) of private property (which remind me of something de Tocqueville said - will post it later when I play with jedi again!). He is a great admirer of the Falwells and will, no doubt, promote their agenda when they control the city.

Flag Comment Posted by Fred on October 13, 2009 at 6:59 pm

jedi, 

OK. It’s my bedtime anyway.

Wasn’t that fun?

Flag Comment Posted by packer2dogs on October 13, 2009 at 6:50 pm

Naturelover, late post…couldn’t get back to our discussion from earlier until now.

The idea that we can balance environment and economy is fallacious in that our economy is based on growth. Growth of production, growth of jobs, growth in the use of resources. The world is finite…the idea of unlimited growth is not sustainable. How can we balance the environment with growth that by its very existence uses our environment towards its own ends?

We can become sustainable in our approach and live differently. Only in this way do I agree with you…I see absolutely no inclination on the part of the US to live differently. I am concerned that we will reap harsh benefits.

In answer to Mr. Knipp, I enjoyed the carbon data. The US still leads in total emissions. If China is #1, so what? Does that allow us to somehow not take a leadership position with regard to carbon reduction? Still, interesting data.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement